David Peters’s blog

David Peters’s blog

Cat People (1942)

Posted by davidpeterssblog on มีนาคม 11, 2010

First in the wondrous series of B movies in which Val Lewton elaborated his in theory of horrors imagined fairly than seen, with a superbly judged effectuation from Simon as the under age wife ambivalently haunted by progenitive frigidity and by a horror that she is metamorphosing into a panther. With its chilling set pieces directed to perfection by Tourneur, it knocks Paul Schrader’s remake payment six, not least because of the care subtly taken to imbue its cat people (Simon, Russell) with feline mannerisms. Its sober subjective footing is barely shaken by the studio’s insistence on introducing, as a stock antipathy motion picture ploy, a shot of a nefarious panther during one crucial scene.

Shadowheart full video download best quality

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Phil the Alien review

Posted by davidpeterssblog on มีนาคม 10, 2010

The sort of Canadian comedy that sounds funnier on the epoch than it looks on the screen, “Phil the Alien” reps a self-purposive mug debut from hyphenate comic Rob Stefaniuk, who stars as a space-borne sculpture-shifter who takes the form of a cliched Canuck after drive-landing in northern Ontario. Pic won’t bolt beyond the border, though it should make tube and homevid landings.

Fueled by the alcohol proffered first by a hunter’s son and then by the denizens of a local tavern run by the cynical Wolf (Graham Greene), Phil gets mixed up with a talking rodent (prompting the credit “Joe Flaherty as the beaver”) and the commander and henchmen of a top-secret UFO base under Niagara Falls, who sic a French Canadian hitwoman named Madame Madame (Nicole deBoer) on the hapless visitor. He later finds religion and fronts a Christian rock bar band. Story structure is too choppy to work up any comic momentum. Rubber-faced comedian Sean Cullen steals the film in his single scene as Madame Madame’s dinner companion. Tech credits are functional; print caught was grainy and dark.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Narc (2002)

Posted by davidpeterssblog on มีนาคม 8, 2010


Narc (R)

Chief

Director:

Joe Carnahan


Producers:

Diane Nabatoff, Glimmer Liotta, Michelle
Grace, Julius R. Nasso


Written by:

Joe Carnahan


Actresses:

Jason Patric, Flash Liotta, Busta Rhymes,
Chi McBride


Rating:


out of 5

Wyvern full video bluray


Narc

is an intense, powerful film that holds your
attention from the first moments right up until the last frame.
The film?s two leads give powerhouse performances that go
deep into feelings of pain, loss, and violence. It also introduces
to the world a young writer/director named

Joe Carnahan

who has managed to do something I thought was impossible:
inject some life into the cop genre.

Detective Nick Tellis (

Patric

) used to be an undercover
narcotics agent. He was removed from duty after inadvertently
hitting a woman with a stray bullet while firing on a suspect.
After months living on his pension he is given an opportunity
to have a full reinstatement to his former position. All he
has to do is assist the department with the investigation
of the murder of another cop, Michael Calvess. Tellis looks
through the files, and envisions the horrific final moments
of Calvess.

Meanwhile, at his home Tellis?s wife is struggling with him
going back to work. Having gone through life with a husband
doing deep undercover work, she doesn?t want to revisit that
particular hell. Tellis tries to tell her that it?s just some
work; that he?s just helping with this case and not going
back undercover.

While going through the files Tellis notices that the lead
investigator on most of the early work was a Detective Henry
Oak (

Liotta

). He tells the police chief (

McBride

)
that the best chance they have is for Oak to be on the case,
but the chief will only let the violence-prone Oak back onto
the case if Tellis agrees to go on active duty, as Oak?s partner.
Even though he knows his wife is against it, Tellis agrees.
He desperately wants to help catch whoever killed this police
officer, husband, and father.

So Tellis meets Oak and learns that Oak is a man who wants
justice, whether or not he has to break the law to get it.
Oak has little to live for, and therefore little to be scared
of, so nothing holds him back from throwing everything he
has into his job. Tellis and Oak then go about unraveling
the twisted events that led up to the day of Calvess?s murder.

The interesting story about

Narc

is that it was made
on a very low budget, very quickly, and premiered at the Sundance
film festival where no one wanted to buy it for distribution.
It wasn?t until

Tom Cruise?

yes that Tom Cruise?saw
it that things started to go well for

Narc

. Cruise
loved it and threw his support behind the film as an executive
producer. With his name attached to

Narc,

Paramount
decided to release the film. After you see

Narc

you
understand why a studio would be wary of it. The feel-good
film of the year this is not.

Narc

is very much in
the style of the ?70s films like

The French Connection

and Detective Henry Oak is an anti-hero in the most literal
sense. Liotta plays Oak with so much passion and intensity
that I identified with him even in his most monstrous moments.


Narc

is Patric?s first major film in several years.
It makes you remember how good he can be, even if he did choose
to be in the unfortunate

Speed 2

. The anguish in his
eyes in the film?s final moments could hit someone in the
back row.

Joe Carnahan has crafted the first inventive, fresh cop movie
in many years. Not only is it one of the best films of 2002,
it?s one of the best gritty cop movies of all time. In a season
where movies like

National Security

and

Kangaroo
Jack

rule the screens, thank God for this intense, adult
film alternative.



?Jesse Trussell

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Mark of the Vampire (1935)

Posted by davidpeterssblog on มีนาคม 6, 2010

“This amusing B&W film,
with photography by James Wong Howe, captures the eerie atmosphere befitting
a horror film.”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

This is a creaky horror film, with plenty of fun moments in its wobbly
story. It’s a remake of Tod Browning’s silent “London After Midnight,”
which starred Lon Chaney in dual roles as Professor Zelen and Count Mora.
It is played mostly as a spoof on vampires, but has a nifty murder mystery
going for it. Plus it has some gimmicky camera work, featuring an apparition
and a scary dark castle filled with strange sounds, cobwebs, spiders, bats,
and rodents.

When Sir Karell Borotyn is found murdered in this remote Czechoslovakian
village with the two marks of a vampire on his neck and his blood drained,
the skeptical Inspector Neumann (Atwill) investigates the crime and tells
the frightened Dr. Doskil (Meek) to find the real cause of death and not
to tell him about this vampire nonsense. When the doctor can’t, still believing
the superstitions that persist in the village, the inspector calls for
help from Professor Zelen (Lionel Barrymore). He’s a specialist in the
occult.

The professor and the inspector are baffled by the case as a year
passes with no results, and decide to try a radical plan by hiring vaudeville
performers, Count Mora (Bela Lugosi) and his daughter Luna (Carol Borland),
to act as vampires and smoke the real murderer out. Luna is a chalky-faced
apparition and Lugosi plays a vampire. Lugosi steals the picture by hamming
it up, even though he only has one line in the film. But the biggest ham
is Barrymore, he makes every line into a stage-like performance.

The inspector questions everyone in Sir Karell Borotyn’s castle,
after he had been murdered. He learns that Karell’s pretty daughter Irena
(Allan) is to marry within two weeks Count Feodor Vincenty (Wadsworth),
someone not of the same wealth and status as she is. He also learns that
in case of Karell’s death, his closest friend Baron Otto von Zinden (Jean
Hersholt) is to be the executor of the estate. The servants Jan and Maria
are also questioned and are asked to look after Irena, who fears the vampires
are going to attack. The servants are ordered to put bat-thistles in all
the rooms as a deterrent to the vampires, who only come out at night.

This amusing B&W film, with photography by James Wong Howe, captures
the eerie atmosphere befitting a horror film. It’s a classic horror spoof,
well worth seeing for either nostalgia purposes or lighthearted fun.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Runaway Jury review

Posted by davidpeterssblog on มีนาคม 3, 2010


Gene Hackman is a great actor. He not under any condition makes stale pictures. Even-handed when the picture could be remorseful, Hackman’s very presence in it makes it raise. He has a commanding manner about his performances, and he dominates the screen. There’s a self-assurance about him, whether he’s playing a kind guy or bad, that tells us he, at least, is dauntless this is a good movie.

Now, floor in other great actors like Dustin Hoffman, John Cusack, and Rachel Weisz, and you’ve got a thrust importance dying for and a film worth watching.

There’s only undivided teensy-weensy thing wrong with this scenario. I didn’t believe a dispatch in the whole motion picture. “Runaway Jury” is the first adaptation of a John Grisham fresh whose premise and doings I set up didn’t echoing true fit a second. Yet I enjoyed the shoot from genesis to end. Go symbol.

Grisham has been the master of the Hollywood courtroom stagecraft in the interest of certainly a while contemporarily, but this yet his backroom skullduggery strikes me as distance overdone. The plan of “Runaway Jury” is that juries can be rigged if the right people are involved and enough in money is available. Big jury trials like the everybody depicted in the movie are apparently ripe pickings suitable people whose profession it is to tamper with jury selection and jury members. These people, known as jury consultants, may work for prosecutors or defense teams in selecting members of juries who might pinched favorably toward their side, and in the if it should happen of “Runaway Jury” these consultants may even intimidate, buy, and blackmail jury members to render favorable decisions. The first notion I can go along with; lawyers doubtlessly do hire consultants on chance to improve them with jury selection. The next notion, however, that consultants can easily manipulate juries during a test, is more difficult to accept, at least on the grand rank proposed in this cloud.

Here’s the setup: Dustin Hoffman plays bencher Wendell Rohr, who represents the widow of a man murdered in a shooting spree. The woman is suing the company that manufactured the gun used in the devastating, and the gun producer is understandably alarmed, as is the with few exceptions arms industry, because a win against the company could drop an important paradigm in favour of suing gun companies all over the country. Millions, peradventure even hundreds of millions, of dollars are at ante, so the gun company in question is willing to hire the most outstanding lawyers and the best jury consultant reasonable to defend themselves.

The consultant the defense hires is Rankin Fitch, played by Gene Hackman. He couldn’t be more divergent from Rohr. Whereas Rohr is a scrupulous idealist, Fitch is an unscrupulous opportunist. He’s renowned, but he’s only in it in the interest of the folding money. Fitch doesn’t protect what he does, whom he hurts, or what laws he breaks to get his on the move. “Trials are too important to be left-hand to juries,” he says. Obviously, he is taxing to rig the jury and maintenance it rigged in favor of his client, the gun company.

Straight away occasionally, at before glance you would think this film over is prospering to be a chess match between Rohr and Fitch, as each control maneuvers as a replacement for the most favorable positions with the jury. But not so. The real story involves a monkey blow thrown into the machinery, because there is a third, outside force also attempting to rig the jury and the outcome of the enquiry, and it is this surface force that is playing on both Rohr and Fitch. The behave is, for the highest price the case force disposition move the verdict to one or the other side. Will Rohr concede his patronizing principles to be compromised? And will Fitch, who never loses, allow himself to be manipulated? Not if Fitch can help it, and he’s not about to rule out the use of corporeal violence if he needs to try out it.

John Cusack plays Cut Easter, a video-game store manager who is reluctantly selected as a juror on the trial, and Rachel Weisz plays Marlee, the mysterious outside source who is working with someone inside the jury paddling pool to rig the verdict. Bruce McGill (still most notoriously famous as D-Hour in “Animal House”) plays Judge Harkin, the no-eyewash Neutrality presiding over the case.

Could any of the plot’s twists and turns actually be brought to someone’s attention? Possibly. Are they likely to occur? Probably not. Fitch, for instance, not barely helps his side select the jury by cranny researching the unseen of each potential jury member, but he directs a control center filled with ample people and electronic tack to make NASA’s leadership center object of the Mars landings look dwarf. Moreover, he has thugs at his disposal who will stop at nothing, including arson and murder, to lay hold of their way.


Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Crying Game review

Posted by davidpeterssblog on มีนาคม 1, 2010


Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Get ready for some horse-ridi…

Posted by davidpeterssblog on กุมภาพันธ์ 28, 2010

Nettle content for some horse-ridin’, gun-totin’, whiskey-drinkin’ tomfoolery in this digitally remastered collector’s edition of Lawrence Kasdan’s SILVERADO, featuring a never-before-seen featurette with interviews from the colouring and the filmmakers! The spirited Western stars Kevin Kline, Scott Glenn, Kevin Costner, and Danny Glover as four unwitting heroes who cross paths on their journey to the sleepy township of Silverado. Little do they know the city where their family and friends reside has been infatuated on the other side of by a buy off sheriff and a murderous posse. It’s up to the intense-shooting foursome to save the day, but first they be undergoing to break up each other gone of clink, and learn who their real friends are. Thanks to its authentic look and spectacular chuck, which also includes Rosanna Arquette, John Cleese, Brian Dennehy, Jeff Goldblum, and Oscar®-winner Linda Search (1983 Best Supporting Actress, The Year of Living Dangerously), this exciting Old West adventure created a whole new begetting of Western fans and earned its ‘modern classic’ status. ‘Lawrence Kasdan’s revisionist Western is horrific fun.’ -ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY. ‘Fun…exuberant-spirited, joyous…’ -Roger Ebert, CHICAGO SUN TIMES

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The tag line for the 2004 rel…

Posted by davidpeterssblog on กุมภาพันธ์ 26, 2010


The tag line in the course of the 2004 release “I Heart Huckabees” is “an existential comedy.” I’m not utterly sure what that’s putative to mean, except that all of us are trying to spot some kind of meaning in life and so are the characters in this movie. Peradventure it implies that our whole existence is a lenient of comedy, like Saroyan’s “The Mortal Comedy,” although Saroyan’s version was in a more deprecatory manner. I rather suspect “I Heart Huckabees” is meant to be as silly-goofy as possible, and in that regard it succeeds. If lone the silly goofiness were as funny as it is hyperactive, and if only the film didn’t kill itself so at face value.

As a send-up of the up to the minute world’s pop-culture quest for meaning at its simplest, the movie’s legend spoofs the shallow icons we all so get a kick relying on, the “Heart” in “I Guts Huckabees” being the symptomatic of seeking a middle (as in “I Have a crush on Huckabees”), a sign that most newspapers, magazines, and Web sites can’t question copy. The title is like a individualized license lamina; you know, as a replacement for people who think they take something respected to influence, whether it’s important or not. Or maybe the title is only just a guy of our own bent for self-promotion. Or maybe it’s not satirizing anything at all and is just meant to be self-consciously crafty. As if most of the film, the title is divulge to interpretation, amusing if not strikingly mysterious.

The cover stars some icons of its own, late-model and old. Some of the newer ones are Jason Schwartzman, Correct Wahlberg, Naomi Watts, and the fellow that Oscar emcee Chris Rock said was in every movie made in 2004, Jude Law. But it’s the longer-established stars who shine the brightest: Talia Shire, Tippi Hedren, the perpetually radiant Isabelle Huppert, and the delightfully oddball Lily Tomlin and Dustin Hoffman. It’s countless to see these folks as often as we do; Hoffman, exceptionally, is as chameleonlike as ever, playing in the same year an off-kilter dad in “Meet the Folkers,” a straightlaced theater impresario in “Finding Neverland,” an uncredited take critic in “Lemony Snicket,” and here as one of a marry of “existential detectives.”

So, what are “existential detectives”? Satisfactory, according to co-writer and the man David O. Russell (”Spanking the Monkey,” “Flirting With Accident,” “Three Kings”), they are private investigators who try to sort because of and make quick-wittedness of the feasibly random events that find to all of us. They are spiritual gurus who command that all the events in our lives are not unordered; that coincidences are not just coincidences; that we can control our own destinies because all things are meant to hit on after a purpose. Hoffman and Tomlin amusement a husband-and-wife detective team, Bernard and Vivian Jaffe, who, once on a case, take the place of their clients in every nook, real into the bathroom if needful, collecting data and portion them point to some private meaning in their existence. Moreover, these detectives may be real or illusory, metaphoric. The movie outlines a set of humankind’s problems, even if it’s pretty indefinable on cures.

Anyway, their theory is that entire lot in life has meaning because the whole shooting match is connected.

Through the no doubt of the film, the detectives help four people: (1) Albert Markovski (Schwartzman), an environmental activist who feels regretful universal into partnership with a sales directorate at Huckabees, a big retail department-value tie; (2) Brad Stand (Law), said top banana; (3) Dawn Campbell (Watts), Brad’s girlfriend; and (4) Tommy Corn (Wahlberg), a firefighter. All of these people have serious identity problems, serious conflicts within themselves that need resolving. Bernard and Vivian attempt to teach them to attire in scent with their inner selves and convoy the bigger picture in life, choose than breathe on the materialize of things. Bernard tries to demonstration Albert that eternal happiness is derived from conspiratory that “everything in life you could yet want or be, you already have and are.” In other words, we’re all a for the sake of of each other, part of the bigger whole, and the sooner we return that, the sooner we will do to non-violent within ourselves. Sounds a little New Age spacey, doesn’t it. In points, it’s one of the oldest tenets of Eastern point of view.

Isabelle Huppert plays Caterine Vauban, a French author who is the other, darker side of Bernard and Vivian. She is the apparent archfiend, a beautiful domestic who espouses the philosophy that nothing matters. She is a nihilist, suggesting to the characters that they should disavow all bona fide endurance because in the end none it of counts, anyway. Do what you requisite to do, she advises; things longing turn out the same in any chest. The Jaffes and she vie for the other characters’ souls, like God and Satan, if you resolve.

The Huckabees conglomerate wants to reveal a local wetland and woods into a shopping mall. Albert is the coconut of a Save-the-Blue planet coalition out to stop it from chance. Albert hopes that Brad can help him bring around the domain cooperative store not go via with its plans. But Brad hardly wants to get onwards in the business universe. Can he be trusted? Albert feels morally conflicted working with a snake. Dawn is a model who is the “face of Huckabees,” but she’s dead tired of being due another fetching, sexy facade. And Tommy the fireman is an angry tough youth in dearth of some violence-retarding therapy, because his rebuttal to life’s problems is to strap out at them with his fists. They are all looking quest of something more uplifting in life, and they all call upon the existential detectives for help in one way or another.

At its pit, “I Heart Huckabees” is a fable of the modern world, with everything purportedly unconnected and the forces of darkness and unearth pulling us in different directions. Although the movie is silly and flighty, it’s clearly sincere in its attempts to conduct oneself treat with life’s problems, dialect mayhap too genuine, however, to be anything but sporadically funny.


Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Sporadically funny but schemat…

Posted by davidpeterssblog on กุมภาพันธ์ 24, 2010

Sporadically merry but schematically constructed, “Hit and Runway,” Christopher Livingston’s feature coming out, takes the overused concept of the odd couple and applies it to the thorny work relationship between a under age, straight Italian-American writer and an older, gay, Jewish people. The comedy begins surge but lapses into uncertain twists and turns before fatiguing its characters — and viewers — with an outlandishly fake happy ending. There may be a small theatrical audience come up to b become undiscriminating gay and indie viewers, albeit pic should price greater on the undersized screen and the festival pale.

Like many indie filmmakers, co-writers Jaffe Cohen, a standup comic, and Livingston, an NYU alumnus, have seen too many movies; their work feels like a pastiche of sequences borrowed from by previous odd-couple comedies. Most recent source of inspiration is “Kiss Me, Guido,” in which a handsome Italian pizza worker and a gay stage director find themselves sharing an apartment. “Runway” generates laughs, but it suffers from an overly calculated and movieish conception.

Alex Andero (Michael Parducci) is a young man working in his family’s restaurant following his father’s death. Obsessed with movies, he dreams up the character of tuxedo-clad Jagger Stevens (Hoyt Richards), a tough undercover cop busting up an international ring of cocaine-smuggling supermodels. Alex’s cousin , Norman (Bill Cohen), a Hollywood producer, likes the idea and encourages Alex to write a script.

Alex enrolls in a screenwriting class, but lacking any discernible talent, he irritates his rigid, imperious instructor, Bob (Jonathan Hogan), and the class sexpot, Lana (Teresa De Priest). Gwen (Judy Prescott), a shy, self-effacing girl , counters the rejections in Alex’s life by taking a romantic interest in him, though he’s so immersed in his cinematic pursuit that he all but ignores her. It doesn’t help that Gwen wears thick glasses, though it’s clear that they will feature prominently in the plots of “Runway” and its movie-within-the-movie.

Attention then switches to the other protagonist, Elliot Springer (Peter Jacobson), a talented but unattractive writer, a nebbish who looks and behaves like a young Woody Allen. When Elliot becomes smitten with Joey (Kerr Smith), the restaurant’s new and handsome gay waiter, Alex sees new possibilities for his fledgling scripting career. The two begin to meet regularly in Elliot’s apartment and a skeleton for a script emerges after endless bickering. But inspired by his grand amour for Joey, Elliot rewrites Alex’s story and calls it “Hit and Runway.”

In one of the film’s funniest scenes, Elliot takes the gentile Joey to his gay synagogue, where all the older Jews, including the rabbi, shamelessly cruise the young blond. There are also nice scenes between Alex and Gwen, and between Alex and his older, macho brother, Frank (John Fiore), who stands for all the reprehensible values and bad things in life. But overall, the secondary characters and subplots are more interesting and entertaining than the central couple.

Here and there, pic contests cliches about gay men and Italian-Americans, though it’s less successful in the case of the Jewish schlemiel. Worse, beneath the film’s seemingly tough facade hides a soft, naive and moralistic narrative that rehashes old-fashioned, basically invalid cliches, such as the notion that good ideas should come from the heart, or that a person should be a nice and honest human being before becoming a true artist.

The ensemble cast is appealing, particularly Parducci as Alex and Prescott as Gwen, but the film aggressively goes out of its way to entertain — and pander to — the audience. In this respect, “Hit and Runway” recalls “Happy, Texas,” another schematic pastiche that presents itself as new while basically exploiting commonplace movie formats.

Tech credits are decent, but pic overextends its welcome by at least 15 minutes, and last reel is notably weak.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Weather Man (2005)

Posted by davidpeterssblog on กุมภาพันธ์ 22, 2010

Imagine a newborn taking in that first gasp of air, his terrified eyes trying to absorb the glare of the delivery room floodlights. In “The Weather Man,” that is precisely the expression in Dave Spritz’s eyes at any moment, whether he’s calling the weather for a Chicago news station or trying to make sense of his disastrous personal life. He may be an adult in the physiological sense, but, existentially speaking, this guy’s in diapers.

Delivering the forecast in the Windy City means a lot of high-spirited patter about the degrees of misery Chicagoans can expect each day. Dave (Nicolas Cage) may sound authoritative on the air, but he doesn’t know the first thing about meteorology. His value as a celebrity is brought into stark relief on the street. Everybody, it seems, either wants to pester him for predictions or simply toss fast food projectiles at him — Big Gulps, Wendy’s patties, tacos. Then there are his relationships with his recently divorced wife, Noreen (Hope Davis), and two teenage children — all in dire need of intervention — to round off his failings. Should Dave leave all this for a promising job as a weatherman in New York or stay and put right his family issues?

Streaming movie sites have become popular with PC users who spend a lot of time online nowadays. These sites give a possibility to watch full-length feature videos, clips, and even streaming television shows right on your computer using a technology known as ?streaming-video.? On some of these web resources you can even play interactive games in HD with 3D graphics. There are numerous websites offering these services, some free and others requiring paid memberships. The best free movies divx download site is watch-funny-movies.com

“The Weather Man,” directed by Gore Verbinski (”Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl”) and written by Steven Conrad, shines the light on a special kind of heroism — the guts to face up to yourself and make changes. What makes this so emotionally compelling is the way Dave scrambles from this deep vale of cluelessness to something approaching moral maturity.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

« Previous Entries